![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Rereading Agatha Christie
After watching, and not liking, the new adaptation of Towards Zero, I have been thinking a lot about Agatha Christie’s books. And I think I’m going to embark on a re-read. I have read all her novels written under her own name, some multiple times, but not for the last decade, or so. I have been thinking of doing a reread before, but always felt I ought to start with her first one. The problem is that I don’t like The Mystery at Styles much, so I never felt the urge to get started. But really, why should I read them in publishing order? Only the Tommy and Tuppence books have an inner chronology anyway. So instead I’m going to read them roughly in the order of how much I like them. And I may not reread some I don’t care for much.
I read my first Christie when I was 10. It was Death in the Clouds, and I got interested because the cover showed a giant wasp in front of a plane. I was definitely too young for it. I remember enjoying the beginning when they were in the plane, and I really enjoyed the description of what the passengers had in their handbags and pockets. But the rest when Poirot interviews the suspects, I found it very boring. But a few years later I saw the 70s version of Murder on the Orient Express, loved it and promptly found it in my parents bookshelves, and was hooked. I quickly went through the Christie’s we had, The ABC Murders, Sad Cypress, Cyankalium and Champagne and Hickory Dickory Dock. I don’t usually remember where I find the books I read, but somehow remember my first Christie's. I found Nemesis, Sleeping Murder, Three Little Piggies, 4.50 From Paddington, Appointment With Death, Posterns of Fate and Mrs. McGinty Is Dead at our local library. From both sets of grandparents I found At Bertram’s Hotel, A Caribbean Mystery, Death On the Nile, Evil Under the Sun, A Murder Is Announced, Lord Edgware Dies and A Pocket Full of Rye. I also started to collect titles from used book stores. In my late teens I started to read books in English and switched to buying the titles in English instead of Swedish. The last Christie I read was The Hollow.
Over the years Christie has got a lot of slack for being a bad writer, but I think she is the opposite. She’s an extremely economical writer, basically everything that happens in her books is relevant to the mystery. But it takes real skill to be able to pare down your writing to the bare essentials and still be able to write a compelling story. And her writing is compelling. She wouldn’t still sell, if people found her books dull. Many of the Golden Age writers are forgotten today, but there is a timeless quality over her books that makes them easy to access. She’s not perfect, of course. Many of her books show the prejudices of her time, which can certainly be galling. And though I don’t think her characters are the cardboards they are sometimes accused of, she does use stock characters over and over again. The grumpy patriarch/matriarch, the vamp, the downtrodden spinster, the never-do-well, and so on. But just when you think you have her pegged, she turns round her narratives and surprises you.
I think reading Christie in my teens was good insofar as all the detective tropes she uses were new and exciting to me. Which they were for her readers when the books were first published. Because very, very often, Christie was the one who invented them in the first place. So I look forward to this reread, starting with my all time favourite; the Hollow.
If you enjoy podcasts, I can really recommend All About Agatha (can be found on Spotify too). It goes through every single Christie novel in depth, and most of the short stories as well. They also include discussions on the various adaptations. A word of warning, though. One of the hosts died very suddenly a few seasons in, and I found it a bit shocking to hear.
I read my first Christie when I was 10. It was Death in the Clouds, and I got interested because the cover showed a giant wasp in front of a plane. I was definitely too young for it. I remember enjoying the beginning when they were in the plane, and I really enjoyed the description of what the passengers had in their handbags and pockets. But the rest when Poirot interviews the suspects, I found it very boring. But a few years later I saw the 70s version of Murder on the Orient Express, loved it and promptly found it in my parents bookshelves, and was hooked. I quickly went through the Christie’s we had, The ABC Murders, Sad Cypress, Cyankalium and Champagne and Hickory Dickory Dock. I don’t usually remember where I find the books I read, but somehow remember my first Christie's. I found Nemesis, Sleeping Murder, Three Little Piggies, 4.50 From Paddington, Appointment With Death, Posterns of Fate and Mrs. McGinty Is Dead at our local library. From both sets of grandparents I found At Bertram’s Hotel, A Caribbean Mystery, Death On the Nile, Evil Under the Sun, A Murder Is Announced, Lord Edgware Dies and A Pocket Full of Rye. I also started to collect titles from used book stores. In my late teens I started to read books in English and switched to buying the titles in English instead of Swedish. The last Christie I read was The Hollow.
Over the years Christie has got a lot of slack for being a bad writer, but I think she is the opposite. She’s an extremely economical writer, basically everything that happens in her books is relevant to the mystery. But it takes real skill to be able to pare down your writing to the bare essentials and still be able to write a compelling story. And her writing is compelling. She wouldn’t still sell, if people found her books dull. Many of the Golden Age writers are forgotten today, but there is a timeless quality over her books that makes them easy to access. She’s not perfect, of course. Many of her books show the prejudices of her time, which can certainly be galling. And though I don’t think her characters are the cardboards they are sometimes accused of, she does use stock characters over and over again. The grumpy patriarch/matriarch, the vamp, the downtrodden spinster, the never-do-well, and so on. But just when you think you have her pegged, she turns round her narratives and surprises you.
I think reading Christie in my teens was good insofar as all the detective tropes she uses were new and exciting to me. Which they were for her readers when the books were first published. Because very, very often, Christie was the one who invented them in the first place. So I look forward to this reread, starting with my all time favourite; the Hollow.
If you enjoy podcasts, I can really recommend All About Agatha (can be found on Spotify too). It goes through every single Christie novel in depth, and most of the short stories as well. They also include discussions on the various adaptations. A word of warning, though. One of the hosts died very suddenly a few seasons in, and I found it a bit shocking to hear.
no subject
Thanks for the rec of the podcast!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
She’s an extremely economical writer, basically everything that happens in her books is relevant to the mystery. But it takes real skill to be able to pare down your writing to the bare essentials and still be able to write a compelling story.
Agreed! She's not a good writer in the novelistic sense, but she's an extremely effective storyteller and she's just so great at doing exactly what she does, which is write a whodunit. The people who think she's not a good writer want her to be writing a fundamentally different kind of book.
Enjoy your rereading adventure!
no subject
I think so too! If you want your crime novels to be like Dorothy Ls. Sayers, for example, you are bound to be disappointed with a Christie. personally I like them both!
Enjoy your rereading adventure!
Thank you!
no subject
no subject
I was into Christie when I was in my teens and one of my friends got into Christie too so when we had English lessons we'd discuss which ones we'd read.
I hope the re-read goes well!
no subject
I agree!
I hope the re-read goes well!
Thank you!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(By the time I was in the sixth form, I could have handled a wasp cover, although I think I prefer the one I have.)
Mrs McGinty's Dead has been on my mind lately, funnily enough (due to speculation as to whether one of my shows is replicating the Evelyn Hope twist with a baby with a unisex name).
no subject
no subject